Monday, 25 May 2026

Case 3: The Bootmaker Who Borrowed a Name

 A Victorian Mystery

This article is part of an ongoing series treating the photographs in my family collection as primary sources — not simply illustrations of family stories, but historical evidence capable of testing, confirming, and sometimes overturning those stories altogether.

In 1871, a Camberwell bootmaker appeared in the census as “Alec Lee.”

Yet the birth certificates of his children consistently named him as Alfred Ellis.

For more than a decade, the family lived publicly under one surname while keeping another in legal records. The wife was buried as Lee.  But whenever a child’s birth was registered — a permanent legal act — the father gave the name Ellis.

Why would a working-class Victorian tradesman adopt a new identity for fifteen years, then abandon it when he remarried?

And who was the mysterious Alexander Lee whose name he borrowed?

Figure 1 Three Brothers, all the children of James Ellis and Sarah Harriet Jardine with one child from the next generation (son of Alfred Ellis and nephew of the other two). Left to Right: Back Row. James Ellis (b.1833), Richard Ellis (b.1842), Charles Ellis (b. 1874 son of Alfred Ellis & Martha Bartlett), Front Row -seated, Alfred Ellis (b.1839), Camberwell Surrey. Date c1910 [208]

The photograph was found late one afternoon in an old cardboard suitcase in Lurline’s garage, during a visit from a cousin who had come searching for family memorabilia and history. Lurline thought there might be more photographs somewhere. She was right. She disappeared outside for a few minutes, came back with the suitcase, and found the photograph inside. It was instantly clear this photograph mattered.[i][ii]

This particular photograph had a sheet of waxed paper over it with the names of the 4 men written over their images.

Alfred Ellis — the seated man in the front row — had spent fifteen years living under an assumed name. The surviving records allow us to reconstruct how it happened.


1. Alfred Before “Lee”

Alfred Ellis was born in Clerkenwell in 1839, the son of James Ellis, a shoemaker.[iii] He grew up in the crowded artisan households of inner London, surrounded by the tools and rhythms of bootmaking.

But in his early twenties, Alfred drifted. When he married Martha Bartlett in 1864, he described himself not as a bootmaker but as a watchmaker,[iv] a trade entirely unrelated to his father’s. It was a brief detour. Within a year, he had returned to the family craft, registering his first child as a “Bootmaker (Master).”[v]

By 1865, Alfred appeared to be establishing himself independently. But something went wrong. And that is where the story begins to twist.[vi]


2. The First Clue: St George’s Road

In November 1867, Alfred registered the birth of his second child, Edward.[vii] His occupation had changed. He was no longer a “Master” bootmaker. He was now a “Shoemaker Journeyman” —an employee, working for someone else.

He appears to have lost his independence. And he was living at 2 St George's Road, Camberwell.

Now consider the following. That same year, Kelly’s Directory of Surrey listed a master bootmaker trading on St Georges Road under a different name:

Lee Alexander, boot maker, Camberwell.[viii]

A man named Alexander Lee was already there—an established tradesman with his own shop, his own customers, his own reputation. Alfred Ellis, a journeyman, was almost certainly working for him.

The evidence begins to align.


3. The Move to 257 St Georges Road

Between November 1867 and December 1870, something decisive occurred. The family moved from number 2 to 257 St. George's Road—and the name Lee appeared for the first time in the family.

The evidence comes from an extraordinary document: the birth certificate of Martha Sarah Ellis, born 31 December 1870.[ix]

Alfred registered the child as Ellis, as he always would. But the informant was not Alfred. It was Martha herself. And when asked for her maiden name—her name before marriage—she did not write “Bartlett.” She wrote “Lee.”

This is not a registrar’s error. Martha signed the certificate. She had so thoroughly internalised the family’s assumed identity that she gave her everyday social name as her legal former name.

By the end of 1870, the Lee identity had become embedded in everyday family life.


4. Living as the Lee Family

From this point on, the family presented as Lee to almost everyone.

The 1871 census records the household as “Alec Lee” (Alexander Lee), with Martha and the children all listed under the same surname.[x] School enrolments between 1872 and 1876 show the children—Martha,[xi] Kate,[xii] Alfred Jr.,[xiii] and Edward[xiv]—all enrolled as Lee. Martha, the eldest daughter, started at Gloucester Road Infants around age two, then transferred to Gloucester Road School in August 1875.  The father is recorded simply as “Alfred” in the school registers, suggesting he used his real first name in person while maintaining the Lee surname publicly.

But critically, on every single birth certificate from 1865 to 1877, Alfred registered his children as Ellis. He understood that birth registration fixed a legal identity permanently. The census, the school, the neighbourhood—they could call him Lee. The register office would record Ellis.

Alfred maintained a clear, consistent distinction: legal identity vs. social identity—and he never confused the two.[xv]


5. The Children and the Two Surnames

The children absorbed this double identity without apparent confusion.

When Alfred Jr. left home, he used Lee socially. The 1881 census finds him working as a waiter at the Bell Tavern in the City of London, recorded as “Alfred E. Lee.”[xvi] But when he emigrated to Australia in 1887, the passenger list records him as Alfred Ellis—his legal name.[xvii]

His brother Edward followed the same pattern. When admitted to the Gordon Road Workhouse in 1880, he was entered as Edward Lee.[xviii] But when transferred to the Mount Edgcumbe industrial training ship, the naval register recorded him as Edward Ellis.xx Institutional authorities appear to have required his legal surname.[xix]

The daughters, Martha and Kate, navigated the same dual identity. After their mother’s death in 1880, they remained with their father and younger siblings, and in 1881 were baptised under the surname Ellis—their legal name.[xx][xxi] Yet in everyday life, they continued to use Lee. In 1889, they emigrated together to Western Australia under assisted passage schemes.[xxii] Martha later settled in Melbourne and married Walter Todman, while Kate married in Fremantle.[xxiii]

The younger sons—Charles, Walter, and Frederick—eventually dispersed across England, Scotland, Ireland, and Australia. As adults, none appears to have continued using the surname Lee. Their father’s borrowed identity had served its purpose and was quietly abandoned by the next generation.

The children followed the same distinction their father had maintained for years: Lee in social life, Ellis in legal identity. They knew who they were.


6. Martha’s Death and the Deepening of “Lee”

On 2 September 1880, Martha died at 245 St Georges Road from post-partum haemorrhage. She was forty years old.[xxiv]

Alfred registered the death himself. He signed the certificate as “Alexander Lee, Widower.” Not Alfred Ellis. Not even a hybrid. He used the assumed name on a legal document for the first time. And he buried her as Martha Lee.

At first glance, this contradicts his careful avoidance of Lee on birth certificates. But it makes sense when you understand the difference.

Birth registration fixed a permanent legal identity for a child. Alfred never compromised that.

Death and burial recorded the identity a person had lived under. Martha had been Martha Lee to her neighbours, her children, and her community for a decade. Burying her as Martha Ellis would have been not only locally incomprehensible but a kind of retrospective erasure of the life she had actually lived.

Alfred appears to have understood that distinction clearly. In doing so, he chose fidelity to the life she had actually lived over strict legal formality.


7. The Return to Alfred Ellis

On 13 November 1883, Alfred remarried. His bride was Mary Elizabeth Southgate.[xxv] And on the marriage certificate, he appeared as Alfred Ellis—his birth name, his legal name, his father’s name.

The Lee identity was not abandoned overnight. Electoral registers show him listed as Alexander Lee as late as 1890,[xxvi] as Alfred Ellis in 1892,[xxvii] and as Alexander Ellis Lee in 1893 alone — and finally as Alfred Ellis from 1894 onwards, now registered at 118 Commercial Road[xxviii]—a hybrid name that suggests the authorities were trying to reconcile his dual identities. But the reversion had begun.

Why did he go back to Ellis? Most likely because marriage required proof of identity—especially for a widower. His first wife had died as Martha Lee.[xxix] To marry again legally, he needed to establish who he really was.

The Lee period ended as it began: with a practical decision.

8. The Commercial Road Years

By the mid-1890s, Alfred Ellis had settled into something new: ordinariness.

The borrowed name was fading. St George’s Road—where he had traded as Lee for more than a decade—was behind him. Commercial Road, Peckham, became the centre of his later life.

The transition was gradual. Electoral records through the late 1880s and early 1890s show Alfred moving between addresses while still maintaining connections to the St George’s Road premises. But by 1895, he had consolidated both home and business at 118 Commercial Road, where he would remain for the rest of his life.

The 1901 and 1911 censuses both record him there, still working as a bootmaker into old age. For a brief period around 1908–1909, electoral registers suggest he also maintained rooms nearby at 145 Commercial Road, though the reason is unclear.

Alfred Ellis died in March 1912 at 118 Commercial Road. He had spent the final decades of his life living openly under his own name, without any borrowing required.

 

Figure 3 Alfred Ellis outside his shop at 118 Commercial Road, Peckham, c.1908. Electoral registers suggest the family also briefly maintained rooms at nearby 145 Commercial Road during this period. [ T224]

If the photo is examined carefully, the number 118 can be seen on the building. 145 Commercial Rd, Peckham, circa 1908. They lived at 145 Commercial Rd, and the shop was at 118 Commercial Rd.


9. So Who Was Alexander Lee?

The surviving records cannot prove exactly what happened between Alfred Ellis and the original Alexander Lee.

But the most plausible explanation is this: sometime between 1867 and 1870, the original Alexander Lee ceased to operate his bootmaking business at 257 St George’s Road — whether through death, retirement, or emigration. Alfred Ellis, who had been working for him as a journeyman, took over the premises and the trade.

In Victorian England, it was common practice to continue trading under a previous owner’s name. The goodwill of a small business was tied to personal name recognition. Customers knew “Alexander Lee the bootmaker.” A new proprietor trading as “Alfred Ellis at the old Lee premises” risked losing that accumulated trust.

So Alfred became Alexander Lee — in business first, then gradually in every aspect of daily life.

What began as a practical commercial decision became, over a decade, the family’s lived reality. And when Martha signed “Lee” as her maiden name, she was not lying. She was telling the truth about who she had become.

The mystery is not fully solved. We may never know what became of the original Alexander Lee. But the evidence points strongly to a man who borrowed a name to keep a business alive — and found that the name borrowed him back.

For descendants, the story leaves an unusual legacy: a family that lived for years between two names, carrying both identities at once. The surviving records preserve not simply a deception, but the complicated reality of how ordinary Victorian families navigated work, reputation, legality, and survival

  This post is part of Sepia Saturday 827 : Saturday 23 May 2026. Click here to see how others are sharing their history through photographs.

Footnotes


[i] Yvonne Marshall in conversation with Lurline Marshall during a visit to Western Australia, 2003-4

[ii] As told by Yvonne Marshall in a discussion with the author 2003-4

[iv] Marriage certificate of Alfred Ellis and Bartlett Martha, married 27 April 1864; District Shoreditch, Vol 1d, Page 256, General Register Office, England and Wales (certified copy).

[v] Birth certificate for Alfred Ellis, born 15 Oct 1865, son of Alfred Ellis & Martha Bartlett, citing General Register Office, England  GRO Reference: 1865  D Quarter in CAMBERWELL  Volume 01D  Page 584 (certified copy).

[vi] Birth certificate for Alfred Ellis, born 12 October 1839; 1841 census (HO107/661/1/50); 1851 census (HO107/1521/333/42); 1864 marriage certificate (Shoreditch, Vol 1d, p.256).

[vii] Birth certificate for Edward Ellis, born 18 November 1867, son of Alfred Ellis & Martha Bartlett; citing General Register Office, England GRO Reference: 1867  D Quarter in CAMBERWELL  Volume 01D  Page 644 (certified copy).

[viii] 1867 Post Office Directory, in UK, City and County Directories, 1766–1946 (database online), Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., Provo, Utah, 2013; entry for Alexander Lee, boot maker, St George’s Road from Well Street to Crabtree Shot Road, Peckham, Camberwell, Surrey, p. 1482. No building numbers listed. Accessed via Ancestry

[ix] Birth certificate Martha Sarah Ellis, born 31 December 1870, daughter of Alfred Ellis and Martha, citing General Register Office, England, GRO Reference: 1871  M Quarter in CAMBERWELL  Volume 01D  Page 741 (certified copy).

[x] 1871 census of England, London, Surrey, Enumeration District: 19 - St George Road, Camberwell, London, England, folio 130, page 47, Alec Lee head of household; digital images, brightsolid online publishing ltd, Findmypast (www.findmypast.com : accessed 29 Jan 2017); citing PRO RG10/739

[xi] London Metropolitan Archives, School Admission and Discharge Register for Girls, Gloucester Road School, admission entry for Martha Lee, admitted August 1875; giving birth date 2 June 1870, age 5, daughter of Alfred Lee; reference LCC/EO/DIV07/GLO/AD/001. Database: London, England, School Admissions and Discharges, 1840–1911, Ancestry (Lehi, Utah: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010), citing records held by The London Archives, London, England.

[xii] London Metropolitan Archives, Admission and Discharge Register for Girls, Gloucester Road School, admission entry for Kate Lee, admitted June 1876; age 4, born 12 June 1872, daughter of Alfred H. Lee; reference LCC/EO/DIV07/GLO/AD/001. Database: London, England, School Admissions and Discharges, 1840–1911, Ancestry (Lehi, Utah: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010), citing records held by The London Archives, London, England.

[xiii] London Metropolitan Archives, Admission and Discharge Register for Boys, Southampton Street School, admission entry for Alfd Lee, admitted 21 September 1874; age 8, born 15 October 1865, son of Alfd Lee; reference LCC/EO/DIV07/SOU/AD/001. Database: London, England, School Admissions and Discharges, 1840–1911, Ancestry (Lehi, Utah: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010), citing records held by The London Archives, London, England.

[xiv] London Metropolitan Archives, Admission and Discharge Register for Boys, Southampton Street School, admission entry for Edward Lee, admitted 21 September 1874; age 6, born 31 December 1867, son of Alfd Lee; reference LCC/EO/DIV07/SOU/AD/001. Database: London, England, School Admissions and Discharges, 1840–1911, Ancestry (Lehi, Utah: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010), citing records held by The London Archives, London, England.

[xv] 1871 census of England; school enrolment records (1872–1876) show children enrolled as Lee, father recorded as “Alfred.”

[xvi] 1881 England Census, London City registration district, civil parish of St Martin Ludgate, Enumeration District 2, RG11/377, folio 17, page 2, entry for Alfred E. Lee, aged 15, waiter, born Peckham, Surrey, living and working at 61 Old Bailey, “The Bell Tavern,” in the household of Sarah A. Suggate; database, Ancestry (Provo, Utah: Ancestry.com Operations Inc., 2004).

[xvii] Victoria, Australia, Assisted and Unassisted Passenger Lists, 1839–1923, Public Record Office Victoria, North Melbourne, Victoria; Inward Overseas Passenger Lists (British Ports), microfiche copy of VPRS 947, Series VPRS 7666; entry for Alfred Ellis, English, age 21, arrived 6 August 1887 on Orient, departing London and arriving at Adelaide, Melbourne and Sydney, Australia; database, Ancestry (Ancestry Record 1635 #3166801, accessed 17 April 2022).

[xviii] Entry of Admission for Edward Lee Gordon Road Workhouse 10 March 1880 (Ancestry, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930, Gordon Road Workhouse 1879-1892, London Metropolitan Archives, London, England. LEBG/189/1 [Image 30 of 238, accessed 17/08/2015]

[xix] Census returns of England and Wales, 1881, Civil Parish, Township or Place: St Germans - extract for Edward Ellis living on the "Mount Edgcumbe" Industrial Training Ship (1881 Census, Registration district: St Germans, Sub-registration district: Saltash, ED, institution, or vessel: Industrial Training Ship Mount Edgeumbe, Public Records Office, England (PRO) RG11/2282/177

[xx] Church of England Parish Registers, St Luke’s, Peckham, Southwark, London, baptism register, entry for Martha Ellis, baptised 27 May 1881, no. 578, p. 73; London Metropolitan Archives, London, England; in London, England, Church of England Births and Baptisms, 1813–1906, database and images, Ancestry, Ancestry (accessed 27 January 2017).

[xxi] Church of England Parish Registers, St Luke’s, Peckham, Southwark, London, baptism register, entry for Kate Ellen Ellis, baptised  9 September 1881, no. 686, p. 86; London Metropolitan Archives, London, England; in London, England, Church of England Births and Baptisms, 1813–1906, database and images, Ancestry, Ancestry (accessed 27 January 2017).

[xxii] Passenger and Crew Lists, ship Nairnshire, passenger list, p. 3, arrival 8 October 1889, entry for Kate Ellen Ellis and Martha Sarah Ellis; State Records Office of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia; copy of original record provided via email by Tom Reynolds, 8 February 2013.

[xxiii] Marriage Certificate, Walter Todman and Martha Ellis, married 16 January 1892, reg. no. 345/1892; Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages, Victoria, Australia; indexed in Victorian Marriage Index, Victoria BDM (accessed 23 May 2026).

[xxiv] Death Certificate, Martha Lee, 2 September 1880, St George, Camberwell, Surrey, England; citing September quarter 1880, Camberwell registration district, vol. 1d, p. 534; General Register Office, Southport, England. The certificate records her cause of death as post-partum haemorrhage.

[xxv] Marriage Certificate, Alfred Ellis and Mary Elizabeth Southgate, 13 November 1883, Camberwell registration district, Surrey, England; citing December quarter 1883, vol. 1d, p. 1263; General Register Office, Southport, England.

[xxvi] London Metropolitan Archives, Electoral Registers, Southwark Camberwell North, 1890, entry no. 2846 for Alexander Lee, house at 52 Commercial Road, Peckham, and shop at 245 St George’s Road; image 52 of 221; London, England, UK

[xxvii] London Metropolitan Archives, Electoral Registers, Southwark Camberwell North, 1892, entry no. 2836 for Alfred Ellis, house and shop at 245 St George’s Road, p. 68, image 74 of 372; London, England, UK.

[xxviii] London Metropolitan Archives, Electoral Registers, Southwark Camberwell North, 1894, entry no. 2850 for Alexander Ellis Lee, house at 245 St George’s Road; London, England, UK.

[xxix] Death Certificate, Martha Lee, 2 September 1880 Informant: “Alexander Lee, Widower.”